Who Cares How You Look?
The birds do, Mr. Doo-doo.
After my last post, I have to say that the hickory horned
devils are now second instar and, ahem,
big enough to be outside now, and everyone is happy about this,
especially the hickory horned devils.
(I’ll talk about the arcane practice of “sleeving”
caterpillars in a subsequent post.)
Each time a caterpillar sheds its skin to grow larger, it is
said to have entered the next “instar.” The hickory horned devils are now in
the second instar out of five. Some caterpillars look pretty similar in every
instar (lunas, for example), but some change their appearances fairly
significantly. Hickory horned devils are in the latter group. They are about an
inch long and look like this:
What do you notice about the appearance of second instar
hickory horned devils? Well, to birds they look like bird poo… or so
entomologists think (who really knows what birds think?).
A fairly typical bird dropping. Yes this is gross – but the
demands, of science, etc. If you look carefully at tree leaves, you see this
all the time because a lot of birds perch in trees.
Viceroy butterfly caterpillar
Sure, these caterpillars look pretty different from each
other (and from the hickory horned devil), but you see the overall pattern – bumpy
shape, white splotches mixed almost randomly with other colors, especially dark
browns. Behaviorally, each of these caterpillars tends to rest curled in a questionmark shape. You can see the resemblance with the bird poo and with the hickory horned devils (though my photos aren't great).
Why do so many caterpillars use this kind of camouflage?
(This is actually a form of what we call “mimicry” – but much more about that
in later posts.) Well, there are some obvious answers. First, it’s a common
pattern on tree leaves, so it really is a good pattern to copy if you want to
blend in. Second, to birds it looks like… poop. Most creatures have a built-in
dislike for putting that stuff in their mouths (or even getting near it)
because being in contact with it is a great way to catch diseases from your
fellow creatures. Think about your own disgust – it’s hardwired in us by
evolution. Though not all species share
this built-in disgust or “aversion”
(dogs come to mind as an counter-example) to feces from their own kind, it’s common enough to assume it’s
likely to be present in many birds.
So that’s why this appearance pattern works as a survival “strategy,” but how did
so many different kinds of caterpillars come up with it? (I’ve only shown a few examples – there are hundreds, if not thousands of others out there.) You need to remember
here that bugs don’t actually consciously “come up with” these natural tricks
that help them survive, any more than you “came up with” your natural hair or
eye color to make you look cool and attractive to other people. The caterpillars’ appearance was, originally,
the result of a random set of mutations -- or a random new combination of existing
genes -- that accidntally happened to create this appearance. But the pattern
happened to work for the bug that first was gifted with it by chance, and it
survived ... and made a lot of similar bugs that also survived, and so the genes –
the genetic instructions for how to look like bird poo – got passed on and
became common. Because the trick works, the genes then stay common, even as the
species evolved and passed on its genes to many other species, its
ancestors. This is basically how natural
selection works on genes over time – genes that have a lot of usefulness stay
in species’ genomes because they keep coming in handy in staying alive.
From the examples I showed above, you might have caught the
fact that there are both butterflies and moths that use this pattern. Think about what this means – biologists know
pretty much for certain that all butterflies and moths are relatives – they have
evolved from common ancestors, with butterflies first evolving from moths about
100 million years ago (this is a guess,
of course – the oldest fossils of butterflies are about 48 million years old,
but these fossils are very modern butterfly-like, indicating that the split
from moths had to be earlier). This
means that genes that are shared between moth and butterfly species would have to be pretty ancient – at least
100 million years old. I would guess
that the basic genetic package for the bird poop-camouflage trick has to go way
back and still be hidden out there in
the genes of most butterflies and moths for it to currently be so common in
this group of animals.
Of course there is another possible explanation – it’s
called “convergent evolution” – where different species independently “come up
with” the same common set of features because, well, it works. This is possible
here. The thing is though, for so many different varieties of moth and
butterfly to come up with this same pattern there would still have to be some
common underlying feature (a broken white/color pattern for example) in order
for it to come up again and again and again. A better bet is that the bird poop
imitation was so successful for the moth/butterfly ancestors that it stayed
around long enough to eventually drift together on the genome as a kind of
package -- a big and complex group of genes that is a fundamental tool for
survival through the bird poop trick.
What’s fascinating to me about this kind of thing in caterpillars
is that you can literally see the animal taking advantage of different parts of
its genetic heritage as it grows up and its situation changes. When the
caterpillar is really little (and too small to be mistaken for bird poop), it
doesn’t look like this at all, as we have seen.
When it gets bigger, it’s too big to be mistaken for bird poop, and so
its appearance changes again. But when the caterpillar is in its second instar,
it is really just about the right size, so the time is right for natural
selection to again pull these genes out of an ancient bag of tricks. Pretty
cool, I think, the way you can see all kinds of pieces of ancient history
coming out and showing itself to you in a living bug.
Bibliography
Bibliography
Wagner, David L.
2005. Caterpillars of Eastern North America .
Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Scott, James A. 1986. The Butterflies of North America. Stanford University Press, Stanford.
No comments:
Post a Comment