A Southern Strategy
The votes are in…
… and surprise, surprise, the southerners have simple
tastes.
As I noted a couple of posts ago, I decided to try a simple
experiment with the hickory horned devils (aka regal moth caterpillars) and how
they react to different foodplants. I did this because they are known to eat a
wide variety of trees, but some of my source books say (this is what scientists call “reviewing
the literature”) that ” local populations may have different preferences.” I
decided to try my caterpillars on sweet gum and hickory, both of which are
described in the books as “primary” choices for the moth. I assumed that they would be willing to eat
either, but I was going to test which produced bigger, healthier caterpillars.Well, as I said, surprise, surprise – the experiment was over almost before it began. When I gave some of the caterpillars pignut hickory (the most common hickory in our area), they clearly refused to eat it. Newly hatched caterpillars sat together on the glass walls of their hatching cage, like kids huddling in a crowd outside a classroom they don’t want to enter, and wouldn’t go near the leaves, though they were fresh and clean. After a day and a half, I began to worry that they were going to die if they didn’t eat, so I also put in some sweet gum leaves, which their earlier hatchlings had already accepted readily. Within an hour, they were on those and eating – you can see this in the picture below.
So, these Charlotte-area hickory horned devils have a definite preference for sweet gum – I would
actually call it a requirement, since I’m pretty sure they would have died
before eating the other plant. If I had more caterpillars to and if I was
willing to let them die, I would have tried a lot of other plants and I would
have pushed the experiment to the bitter end. This might have given me what
scientists call “solid experimental confirmation” of the conclusion that my
caterpillars exclusively feed on one tree. Actually, a fuller experiment would
have been to run the experiment with caterpillars from multiple local moths (to
make sure this moth’s caterpillars were not just freakishly picky) and at the
same time also running the experiment with caterpillars from a moths caught in
other places, say somewhere in the deep south and somewhere in the upper midwest.
That would take some work, so forget it for now.
Nonetheless, I have a solid “hunch” that this piece of
information is “meaningful.” Here’s why: the food preferences of my
caterpillars is clear, it agrees with other “field sightings” I’ve had (the
only fully grown hickory horned devil I’ve ever seen here was feeding on a
sweet gum tree). I know from long
experience that clear insect behaviors are rarely “anomalies” (something
unique). Insect populations are large in
any given area, population interbreeding happens every year (many times a year
in some species) and natural selection weeds out “bad” behaviors with a fine-toothed
comb. In other words, in the normal word of insect evolution, the major details
regarding bugs in a local environment tend to average out to what works best. If
my bugs like sweet gum over all other foods, chance are the whole extended
family (the whole Charlotte-area hhdevil tribe) feels exactly the same way,
just like I can bet you most of my red-state neighbors won’t be voting for any atheist-socialist-gun-control
candidates this year (I could be
wrong). The regional cuisine of Citheronia
regalis appears to be limited to
sweet gum (ideally, deep-fried).
Though the best source books I have don’t say anything about
this, a quick web-search of some insect/nature sites, does have some people
commenting that southern populations of the moth prefer sweet gum. Most
of these reference are vague/uncertain, clearly because no one has really
studied the matter. The truth is, research in insects in general (except crop
pests), not to mention research in something specific like the larval behavior
of a single moth, is not done much or
well-funded, so no one really knows what’s going on here. In this age where we
know a lot about a lot of biological fine points like individual genes and
proteins, it sounds strange to say, but common features of nature around us
have not been well-studied – by professionals. So the science of this really
depends a lot on the “field reports” of amateurs like me. Think of it as
mobilizing a lot of unpaid interns to do data collection.
So, I say, let’s not let our lack of scientific validity
stop us from going forward with speculation here: back to the “tentative data” I have regarding
the food choices of a mid-southern population of the regal moth…
Consider the history…
If southern regal moth populations are much more specifically
focused on eating sweet gum, how does this make sense, when other populations
(northern populations) are known to eat a lot
of other things – and these other foods are all around in the south?
Let’s look at it the other way – do northern populations eat
other things because of what is available in the north? Let’s look at range
maps for both the regal moth and for the sweet gum tree:
We actually know
that the moth started in the south and expanded northwards (as I explained in
an earlier post) because we have a geological record of relatively recent (only
13,000 years ago) ice ages when glaciers covered North America about as far
south as I live now. When the ice receded, plants and animals (including the
regal moth and the sweet gum) moved back in to recolonize the land, scrubbed
clean by ice. apparently, the sweet gum has not been as rapid in its northern
expansion as the regal moth. Trees can’t fly, so perhaps the range difference
is simply the result of difference of the two species spreading at different
speeds across the landscape, but the maps suggest different ideas. Notice that
the sweet gum isn’t present in higher elevations in the Appalachian Mountains but the Regal Moth is – this tells us that the
sweet gum is probably more sensitive to cold than the moth.
So what happened when the ice receded? It didn’t all happen
at once, but when it did, large areas of land were first colonized by more cold
tolerant species like hickories and walnuts, sycamores and ashes -- the sweet gums could only arrive when the
south became pretty warm. The regal moth, if it had an ancestor living in the
deep south (or if it was an invader from Central America, as I speculated
before), had to be/become a “generalist” with very flexible food habits if it
wanted to take advantage of the new landscape, so it learned to tolerate a wide
variety of foods…
But the moth wasn’t always
a generalist. Back before the ice, when there was no new, unsettled landscape suddenly
open, the moth’s ancestors surely had done what most other moths and
butterflies do – evolved a special interdependence with a specific plant or
family of plants (see earlier post for explanation of how this works), because
that strategy seems to work well. What was the foodplant that the ancestor ate?
My “hunch” (based on extremely sketchy
evidence) is that it was the sweet gum or its ancestor. One thing we tend to
forget about evolution is that, though new gene combinations result in new
features, the genes that made the organism what it was before are generally not
lost, at least not for a while. this
means that most of the genes that helped
the regal moth ancestor live successfully with a specific host plant are still
back there in the genome, and, once the conditions return that made them useful in the past, natural selection will encourage
those genes and the traits they cause to return. The sweet gum is back… and the
regal moth is reverting to its ancient ways, its ancient strategies of
survival, its ancient tastes. I
certainly can’t prove it, but that’s my best guess. Again, it’s fun to start with a little hard
information and… speculate.
“Oh, I wish I was in the land of cotton, old times there are
not forgotten…” Now there’s an idea the
bugs share.
Bibliography:
Tuskes, Paul M., Tuttle, James P. and Collins, Michael M. 1996. The Wild Silk Moths ofNorth America . Cornell University Press, Ithaca , NY .
Tuskes, Paul M., Tuttle, James P. and Collins, Michael M. 1996. The Wild Silk Moths of
Petrides, George A., 1988. A Field Guide to Eastern Trees.Houghton Mifflin Company. Boston.
No comments:
Post a Comment